Comments on: Breezy Badger (5.10) Ports and Versions Roundup http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/ Not quite everything about Ubuntu, but close. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:25:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: sex sikiş http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-148595 Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:18:06 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-148595 This, technically, shouldn’t matter, and I believe the latest ISO (pointed with the ‘daily’ link) is most probably the final one, but there’s nothing that would disprove a theory that this might as well be just a -server version of a pre-release breezy-* daily build, and not a -server version of the final, released build.

]]> By: porno sikiş http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-148496 Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:40:33 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-148496 The latest daily, perhaps? I suppose that will have any critical security updates as well. Breezy is the same as 5.10, so I suspect that is only a naming issue,w hich shouldn’t matter.

]]> By: ixto http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-362 Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:54:04 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-362 hi one question
can i change a ubuntu for a kubuntu,

i am downloadyng a ubuntu mini iso, and i want install kubuntu from this can i do that?

]]> By: Stoking the Fire: An Anarcho-Syndicalist blog by Josh Fuller http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-182 Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:31:57 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-182 OOH! OOH! UBUNTU!

You probably don’t give a shit but Ubuntu 5.10 “The Breezy Badger” has finally been released! I’m downloading the ISO torren…

]]> By: ubuntonista http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-175 Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:03:20 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-175 Thanks Shot, I have now fixed the link.

]]> By: Shot http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-173 Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:19:34 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-173 Ok, I guess I got it all sorted out in the end. The link in the announcement should lead to http://releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/5.10/ – there, in fact, are the ubuntu-server-5.10-* files. :)

]]> By: Shot http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-172 Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:45:58 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-172 Yes, the catch is, in case of the desktop release every ISO up until release was called breezy-*, but the release ones are called ubuntu-5.10-*.

This, technically, shouldn’t matter, and I believe the latest ISO (pointed with the ‘daily’ link) is most probably the final one, but there’s nothing that would disprove a theory that this might as well be just a -server version of a pre-release breezy-* daily build, and not a -server version of the final, released build.

I wouldn’t raise this in case of a desktop install, but on a server, I’d love to be sure that I’m, in fact, using the final release, and not something with, say, some cryptic bug somwhere in /etc/skel that would trickle down to the default files of the users created at install. (That’s an example of a bug that can’t be fixed by upgrading.)

]]> By: ubuntonista http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-171 Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:13:53 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-171 Shot,

The latest daily, perhaps? I suppose that will have any critical security updates as well. Breezy is the same as 5.10, so I suspect that is only a naming issue,w hich shouldn’t matter.

]]> By: Shot http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-168 Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:48:34 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-168 Hm, I somehow missed the server announcement. The question, though: *which* daily should I use, given they all are named breezy-*, not ubuntu-5.10-*? :o )

]]> By: ubuntonista http://embraceubuntu.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-164 Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:36:03 +0000 http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2005/10/13/breezy-badger-510-ports-and-versions-roundup/#comment-164 Shot, Shetil,

From the Ubuntu 5.10 Release Announcement

Ubuntu for Servers: This is a CD installer specifically optimised for server installation. Download this image if you will be setting up servers running Ubuntu.

]]>